ABSTRACT
The goal of this study was to evaluate by endoscopy, possible intercurrences during the sinus floor lifting employing the Summers technique, besides verify the implants' survival rate after 10 years. Six patients (12 sinus) were included in this study. The same surgeon performed the procedures, under local anesthesia and venous sedation in the hospital. All participants underwent sinus lift and implant placement in only one procedure, as previously planned, using endoscopic analysis (Stortz®). All cases received bovine bone graft (Bio-Oss®) before the implant placement. After 10 years, the patients were recalled for follow-up. Two intercurrences (16.66%) were detected using the endoscope, one simple rupture, and another perforation with the leaking of the graft within the sinus. Both were reverted and corrected immediately. There was one implant loss (8.33%), therefore this patient did not undergo any intercurrence in transoperative, and the membrane was elevated lesser than 5 mm. The survival rate reached was 91.66%. The osteotome technique constitutes a reliable method with a long-term of 10 years presenting a high implant survival rate, suggesting an elevation up to 5.5 mm in healthy patients. The occurrences in transoperative were only detected by the endoscopic analysis which must be stimulated to guarantee more secure visibility. Otherwise, the association the atraumatic technique and endoscope was tough, increased the costs, limiting the use routinely.
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar através de endoscopia as possíveis intercorrências durante levantamento de seio maxilar fechado, além de verificar a taxa de sobrevivência dos implantes após 10 anos. Seis pacientes (12 seios maxilares) foram incluídos neste estudo com idades entre 26 e 74 anos. O mesmo cirurgião realizou os procedimentos, sob anestesia local e sedação venosa em ambiente hospitalar. Todos os participantes foram submetidos à elevação do seio nasal e colocação do implante em apenas um procedimento, conforme planejado anteriormente, por acompanhamento transcirúrgico da endoscopia (Stortz®). Todos os casos receberam enxerto ósseo bovino (Bio-Oss®) antes da colocação do implante. Após 10 anos, os pacientes foram chamados para acompanhamento. Foram detectadas duas intercorrências (16,66%) com o endoscópio, uma ruptura simples e outra perfuração com extravasamento do enxerto para dentro do seio. Ambos foram revertidos e corrigidos imediatamente. Houve perda de um implante (8,33%), portanto esse paciente não apresentou intercorrência no transoperatório e a membrana estava elevada menos de 5 mm. A taxa de sobrevivência alcançada foi de 91,66%. A técnica do osteótomo constitui um método confiável em longo prazo (10 anos) apresentando uma alta taxa de sobrevivência do implante, sugerindo que uma elevação de até 5,5 mm em pacientes saudáveis é possível. Assim, verificou-se que as ocorrências no transoperatório foram detectadas apenas pela análise endoscópica que deve ser estimulada para garantir uma visibilidade mais segura. Por outro lado, a associação da técnica fechada com o endoscópio foi difícil, aumentou os custos, limitando seu uso como rotina
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Dental Implants , Endoscopy , Sinus Floor AugmentationABSTRACT
Impacted teeth are a frequent phenomenon encountered by every clinician. The artificial eruption of embedded teeth is the process of directing an impacted tooth into normal occlusion. This procedure is currently attracting attention, with the aim of finding the best technique to use according to each case. This article presents key information regarding impacted incisors, canines, and premolars. In addition, we describe the most common techniques to use for artificial eruption, the open and closed techniques. We review the literature concerning these techniques and outline how clinicians can manage every type of impacted tooth.
Subject(s)
Bicuspid , Incisor , Surgery, Oral , Tooth , Tooth, ImpactedABSTRACT
Background: In order to perform laparoscopic procedures, it is necessary to first access the peritoneal cavity and establish carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. The placement of the first trocar remains a critical step in laparoscopic surgery. In order to minimize complications associated with placement of first trocar, several techniques have been reported. Author describe a surgical technique that provides a quick, safe, and reliable initial access to the peritoneal cavity with its excellent functional and cosmetic results.Methods: Retrospective study of patients who underwent various laparoscopic procedures at Maxx lyfe Hospital, Bathindi, Jammu was carried out by the closed technique for initial access to the peritoneal cavity through the umbilicus from July 2016 to May 2019. In this study, patients who had a prior midline laparotomy with involvement of the umbilicus were excluded.Results: Authors analyzed 456 patients (M = 190; F = 266) in the study period. Average age of the patients was 32 years (range:12-86). A physiologic defect was identified in the umbilical region in all patients who had no history of previous abdominal surgery in that region. The average time to access the peritoneal cavity was 30 seconds (range: 20-50).Conclusions: This technique is quick, safe, reliable, simple, and easy to learn and easy to perform. It is associated with no mortality and minimal morbidity and has excellent cosmetic results. Based on authors experience, authors believe that this method provides surgeons with an effective and safe way to insert the first trocar and recommend it as a routine procedure to access the peritoneal cavity for abdominal laparoscopic surgery.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: Para el neonato con ventilación mecánica asistida la técnica de aspiración a través del tubo endotraqueal se hace indispensable para conservarlo libre de secreciones, de esta forma, se mantiene la vía aérea permeable. En el área hospitalaria, la práctica para realizar este procedimiento contempla una técnica cerrada y otra abierta. Ambas son indispensables en el manejo correcto del paciente, cuando se usan adecuadamente. Objetivo: Analizar a través de la evidencia científica disponible, las ventajas y/o desventajas de las técnicas cerrada y abierta en el paciente neonato intubado. Metodología: Se llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos de Pubmed, CUIDEN, Cochrane y LILACS. Además, se examinaron las listas de referencias de los artículos seleccionados. Desarrollo: Tras la revisión de los resultados y la aplicación de los criterios de inclusión fueron seleccionados seis artículos para el análisis en profundidad de los mismos. Resultados y conclusiones: En el recién nacido que está intubado, la literatura establece que la técnica cerrada ofrece mayores ventajas a los neonatos. Los autores concluyen esto, debido a que la técnica cerrada mantiene el volumen pulmonar y la presión intracraneana en parámetros estables, asimismo, mediante esta técnica se previene la hipoxia e hipoxemia por lo cual se conserva adecuadamente la saturación de oxígeno, el llenado capilar y la frecuencia cardiaca durante el procedimiento.
Introduction: In neonates under assisted ventilation, the endotracheal aspiration techniques become necessary in order to maintain the baby's airway free of secretions. Within the hospital area, the practice of these procedures includes a closed and an open technique. Both are crucial for the correct management of these patients and should always be properly performed. Objective: To analyze, through available scientific evidence, the advantages and disadvantages of the open and closed endotracheal aspiration techniques in the neonatal patient under assisted ventilation. Methodology: A bibliographical review was conducted on the PubMed, CUIDEN, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. In addition, the reference lists of the selected articles were also examined. Development: After the review and application of the inclusion criteria, a total of six articles were selected for in-depth analysis. Results and conclusions: The literature on the neonate under assisted ventilation suggests that the closed endotracheal aspiration technique offers more advantages because it maintains the pulmonary volume and the intracranial pressure within stable ranges, and also, it prevents hypoxia and hypoxemia, adequately maintaining the oxygen saturation, the capillary refill, and the cardiac frequency during the procedure.
Introdução: Para o neonato com ventilação mecânica assistida a técnica de aspiração através do tubo endotraqueal se faz indispensável para conservá-lo livre de secreções, mantendo assim, a via aérea permeável. Na área hospitalar, a prática para realizar este procedimento contempla uma técnica fechada e outra aberta. Ambas são indispensáveis no funcionamento correto do paciente, quando se usam adequadamente. Objetivo: Analisar através da evidencia científica disponível, as vantagens e/ou desvantagens das técnicas técnica fechada e aberta no paciente neonato intubado. Metodologia: Levou-se a cabo uma revisão bibliográfica nas bases de dados de Pubmed, CUIDEN, Cochrane e LILACS. Além disso, examinaram-se nas listas de referências dos artigos selecionados. Desenvolvimento: Após da revisão dos resultados e da aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, foram selecionados seis artigos para a análise exaustiva dos mesmos. Resultados e conclusões: No recém-nascido que está intubado, a literatura estabelece que a técnica fechada oferece maiores vantagens nos neonatos. Os autores concluem isto, devido a que a técnica fechada mantem o volume pulmonar e a pressão ointracraneana em parâmetros estáveis, assim mesmo, mediante esta técnica previne-se a hipóxia e hipoxemia, conservando adequadamente a saturação do oxigênio, o enchimento capilar e a frequência cardíaca durante o procedimento.